Indiana, PA - Indiana County

Helicopter deal, at a glance...

by The Associated Press on December 09, 2013 10:21 AM

Some answers to questions about how the U.S. ended up buying more than $1 billion in new helicopters from the Russian arms export agency that has supplied weapons to Syria’s military.

• Why Russia?

Defense Department officials have maintained that Afghanistan’s national security forces need heavy-duty helicopters capable of moving troops and supplies in rugged conditions, and that Russia’s Mi-17 is best suited for the mission.

• Why couldn’t an American-made helicopter do the job?

Turns out one actually could. A top-secret Pentagon study found the Chinook, a heavy-lift helicopter built by Boeing in Pennsylvania, was the most cost-effective option for the Afghans. Congressional critics of the Mi-17 contract said the Pentagon used the study to prove the necessity of buying Mi-17s and never mentioned the Chinook. The Pentagon declined to speak on the record about the study or detail its conclusions.

• How many members of Congress are opposed to buying Mi-17s?

A lot. From both political parties, too. In July, for example, more than 80 House members voiced their opposition to the contract with Rosoboronexport in a letter to Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel.

Next Article
Bride goes to trial in park death
December 09, 2013 10:20 AM
Related Articles
Comments
Disclaimer: Copyright © 2014 Indiana Gazette. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.